Agroline » Reviews » Forestry equipment »

Reviews Forestry equipment

Search results: 14 reviews

Filter

Add a review

4.6

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2016 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Tried out the Ponsse Ergo recently, and I gotta say, the cab design is pretty user-oriented. The rotating seat and ample space make extended use more comfortable, though encountering the cab on slopes did pose some minor issues. Stability features perform admirably, but I wasn't thrilled with the storage adjustments due to system upgrades. It’s a solid machine for medium to heavy workloads.

3.8

Harvester John Deere 1470

2018 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

3.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Seven seasons with the 1470 and yeah, it mostly does what it should. The cutting header at 5 meters is just right for me, doesn’t feel too wide or narrow. Had a bit of trouble with some broken parts, but to be fair, that was kinda human error, not a machine flaw. Wish JD had put better mounts on some spots, though-those brackets get loose if you don’t keep an eye out. The computer does more than I use, mostly ignored it, but all the key things like RPMs and temps are plain to read. If you care about upgrades and tech, it’s kinda basic, but at least it doesn’t break down much. Cab could use a better seat, my back feels it at the end of the day. All in, not bad, just keep an eye on your hardware and you’ll be fine.

4.4

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2007 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

This harvester gets the job done effectively. I found the extended boom reach pretty useful for accessing hard-to-reach logs. However, its size can sometimes be a challenge on tighter paths, so planning ahead is key. Overall, a sturdy and reliable machine.

4.2

Harvester John Deere 1470

2010 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Used the JD 1470 extensively. It delivers solid control and operation; the handling is intuitive and responsive, which is crucial for precise tasks. Maintenance wasn’t too demanding, though some parts could be more accessible. Pricing is decent for the performance it offers. Overall, a robust piece of machinery.

4.0

Harvester John Deere 1470

2014 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

So, about the John Deere 1470: I’ve operated it quite a bit over the seasons. It’s dependable, but you notice areas for improvement over time, such as the need for frequent component checks and replacements like sieves and chains. The grain tank size seems small for extensive use, but its efficiency balances out. Overall, a good piece for certain scales of work but might lack scalability for larger demands.

4.2

Harvester John Deere 1470

2012 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Had a chance to work with the John Deere 1470. It's straightforward to operate, especially with its clear controls. While it doesn't break down often, parts maintenance can be time-consuming. Overall, a well-rounded machine for medium-scale fields.

4.2

Harvester John Deere 1470

2010 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Well, I’ve spent quite some time working with the John Deere 1470, and here’s my take. The harvester is functional and generally reliable, even after several years in rough conditions. The capacity of the grain tank and overall productivity might feel limiting if handling larger fields. Maintenance isn’t too intense, but some aspects like worn bearings and cylinder issues require periodic attention. While it’s not the most feature-packed, it delivers solid performance for what it’s designed to handle.

4.2

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2019 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

I put in over a thousand hours on the Ergo this year. It’s a solid harvester, does fine on long shifts without needing to refuel, big tank makes a difference. The tilt cab is cool, helps when working on hills or rough spots, but takes a bit to get used to if you’ve been driving old machines. No big issues with reliability so far, keeps chugging along. Hydraulic system's solid, but changing the fluid is a messy job every single time. The control layout is okay, not my favorite, but I can reach everything I need to. Wish there was a bit more space in the cab, it’s okay but a bit tight for storing gear. Didn’t notice any crazy fuel savings from the injection system but not burning more than other machines either. All in all, it's a workhorse, just not perfect.

4.6

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2015 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

I’ve driven the Ponsse Ergo on various terrains. The C5 telescopic crane excels with its reach and power, although it does require some periodic maintenance which may disrupt schedules slightly. Hose layout improvements are noticeable and facilitate quicker interventions. For early thinnings, visibility could be better around the crane setup. However, excellent engine performance balances out such nuances.

4.4

Harvester Ponsse Scorpion

2015 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Short take from someone who runs harvesters full season: productivity is up. The machine moves smooth, cycles faster and Opti‑5G keeps setups simple so you waste less time fiddling. They talked energy-efficient drives and that should cut fuel use; early signs are good but I want months of data. Availability looks ok, Ponsse has done volume before and parts network seems covered. Downsides - 5G sounds great but in real remote patches you’ll still rely on local systems, so don’t expect cloud magic everywhere. Price? Ask your dealer, not on the briefing. For training rookies the Active Crane is gold, they learn faster and hit acceptable production sooner. All in all more productivity, cautious on connectivity and real fuel numbers.